Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Some thoughts on the conspiracy of 9/11....

.
.
Good Morning Friends,
.
.
today is Wednesday August 5, 2009
.

Still resting up and nursing my wound from a couple of days ago. Not sure what the weather is like outside actually. You know friends, I spend a lot of time on my computer and I watch quite a few videos as well. My computer is like my television I suppose, in that it is my main entertainment vehicle. It is also my main source of knowledge as well. And, I do in fact spend a great deal of time on this machine.
.
One of the things that I am interested in is the 9/11 conspiracy. Now, I am certainly no expert so don't get me wrong. I just watch a lot of the videos related to this event that is all. And, every time I watch a related 9/11 video the more it cements in my mind that something is definitely wrong with the conspiracy as provided to us by the government - The Official Conspiracy Theory. There are simply too many questions that remain unanswered. And, I think what keeps the conspiracy people going - people like myself - is that the government, and especially people related to the last government, refuse to participate in the discussion. This very fact almost condemns them by their very acts of silence, or even their lack of participation. It is not good enough to remain silent I feel because you must provide evidence and supporting documentation to prove that you are innocent - especially if people are pointing fingers at you.
.
I think what bothers a good part of population is how the former Bush government benefited from the attacks. It has the smell of a ' false flag ' operation quite simply and that is what keeps a lot of us going. Yes, this very detail is the thing that keeps us going and interested. More on this idea later.
.
There are a lot of technical details of the event itself that provide a lot of meat for discussion among the debaters as well. Was there explosives in Buildings One, Two, and Seven, for example? Why do they have the appearance of a free fall or a controlled demolition? That is what the videos look like you know. But, then of course there are those on the other side of the argument who can provide information indicating that there are valid reasons for why the buildings fell as they did. For example, the buildings were weakened by fire, the steel softened to the extent that they could not support the structure and so forth. But, even more convincing evidence comes from those who question the official version. It is not hard to be a critic of the government when we know that the temperatures provided by the airplanes that hit the buildings is not hot enough to melt steel so this could not be the cause of the collapse. Also the fact that these buildings were built with the idea of withstanding an airplane collision. And, then there is the way the buildings actually fell - in an apparent free fall mode. These buildings needed help to fall and they apparently got it. No office tower made of steel has ever fallen as a result of fire up until September 11, 2001. Yet three of them do and one of them ( Building Seven ) was not even hit by an airplane and had minimal damage and only small fires burning. Yet, the building is " pulled ", and once again it falls in a free fall manner.
.
Why is Dick Cheney in the bunker conducting war games involving the same thing that is happening in the real world? Is this just a coincidence, or were things planned this way? By planned I mean that Cheney is in a good position to thwart the hijackers by sending up planes to knock them out the sky. Cheney does nothing except watch the events unfold. There is no order to attack and the planes stand down. Standard procedure has it that an interceptor airplane will be scrambled when an airplane goes off course or if a hijacking takes place. Within minutes a plane would be up in the air and dealing with the recalcitrant plane. Yet, the planes go about their business untouched and slam into two office towers in downtown New York. Something hits the Pentagon and an airplane is reported to be crashing in a field in Pennsylvania, yet there are no bodies and no plane parts. All strange events and numerous questions related to all of these incidents.
.
Why is the hole in the Pentagon so small as to appear as though a huge jet did not cause it? And, why is the attack confined to an area of the building that would not cause a great deal of harm or damage? Why is there no evidence of plane parts similar to the type of plane that was supposed to have crashed into it? Where are the dead people? Why are workers from the building carrying parts away quickly? Why are we not shown the other videos from the Pentagon attack? Why all of the secrecy and cover up going on?
.
So, just from this brief survey you can see why the conspiracy theorists do not believe anything that the government says regarding this incident. The conduct of the government itself becomes suspicious and easily leads one to the conclusion that they had a hand in the whole affair. The government, by its very actions, becomes a prime suspect - and that is even if they were not complicit. Their actions make them look like criminals.
.
As I said earlier on this whole thing had the smell of a false flag operation. Afghanistan was quickly invaded with no proof that Bin laden had a hand in the job. Bin Laden is not even an official suspect. And then there was the invasion of Iraq. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and was not linked to Al Qaeda. The attack only became an excuse to invade the country and to control its resources and that is what is happening. So, you can easily see why the government is a prime suspect in this case.
.
Some say that the government wasn't involved in an ' inside manner ', but that they merely gained from the attack itself. But, there is much evidence to show that the government knew an attack was forthcoming. Israel and German intelligence was telling them that an attack was coming. Why is George Bush looking like a goof when he is being told that the nation is under attack? Why does he not stop immediately what he is doing and take command of the situation - a situation in which a nation is under attack. That is what would be expected of a Commander in Chief would it not? Yet he does nothing and continues on with his visit to the elementary school. Dick Cheney is the bunker playing war games and George Bush is reading a book upside down.
.
And, after the attacks when the population is hungry for answers and wanting to know what happened, what did the government of George Bush do? They stifle any enquiry for hundreds of days and they will not testify separately or take an oath guaranteeing their veracity and innocence in the matter. And, they wanted to hire their own inside people to conduct the investigation. To date, no official inquiry has taken place, and there has been no attempt to get to the bottom of the matter and to find out in any meaningful way who could have done the crime. That is why 9/11 remains such a topic of discussion for so many people, people like myself. And, that is because there is indeed something wrong here. The U.S. media itself does not spend any meaningful time on the issue either. They are either afraid or disinterested to conduct any kind of real journalism, a journalism that would be a benefit to society. So, that is a real telling feature in itself now isn't it? That the truth cannot come out because there are not enough people in the right places that are willing to get involved and to help solve this mystery of the century.
.
There are numerous other questions related to 9/11 as I am sure many of you are aware. But, I just wanted you to get used to the idea that the 9/11 incident is far from a done deal, even though the government would like you to believe that it is. Like the Warren Commission that investigated the Kennedy assassination we are supposed to be satisfied with the results. But, as you can easily determine by the discussion here many of us are not.
.
Here is a very fine conspiracy video that I recommend to you:
.
The Ultimate Conspiracy
.
.